Package Details: vscodium-bin 1.100.23258-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/vscodium-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: vscodium-bin
Description: Binary releases of VS Code without MS branding/telemetry/licensing.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: vscodium
Provides: codium, vscode, vscodium
Submitter: ckatri
Maintainer: sperg512 (Icelk)
Last Packager: Icelk
Votes: 334
Popularity: 7.29
First Submitted: 2020-09-23 18:58 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-05-15 19:00 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

sperg512 commented on 2021-05-12 00:31 (UTC) (edited on 2024-06-04 15:14 (UTC) by sperg512)

@Icelk set up a script that checks for new releases and pushes updates if there are any new ones. I believe it runs every hour so there's no need to flag OOD, unless there's something that needs changed with the PKGBUILD.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next › Last »

Icelk commented on 2021-09-16 07:35 (UTC)

The hash in the PKGBUILD is the same as https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium/releases/download/1.60.1/VSCodium-linux-x64-1.60.1.tar.gz.sha256, the hash validating the download. It's a problem with VS Codium's build process. Try clearing the package cache.

gameslayer commented on 2021-09-16 07:26 (UTC)

Still having issues with the checksum 

Building vscodium-bin...
==> Making package: vscodium-bin 1.60.1-3 (Thu 16 Sep 2021 16:19:56)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
  -> Found vscodium-bin.desktop
  -> Found VSCodium-linux-x64-1.60.1.tar.gz
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    vscodium-bin.desktop ... Passed
==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums...
    VSCodium-linux-x64-1.60.1.tar.gz ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
Failed to build vscodium-bin

wooque commented on 2021-09-16 07:20 (UTC) (edited on 2021-09-16 07:22 (UTC) by wooque) 

==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums...
VSCodium-linux-x64-1.60.1.tar.gz ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

Icelk commented on 2021-09-16 05:58 (UTC)

@GNQG The hashes should be correct now. The same weird thing happened now as my previous comment.

GNQG commented on 2021-09-15 23:16 (UTC)

The checksum for x86_64 seems incorrect too.

gurustave commented on 2021-09-14 19:12 (UTC)

@Icelk Installed just fine on my Pinebook Pro now! Thanks.

Icelk commented on 2021-09-14 18:55 (UTC)

@gurustave The newest version should have the correct hashes. I just reran the script, which worked! It seems the hashes the script gets from GitHub have changed, or some niche network error occurred while fetching them. What is weirder is that only the arm hashes were wrong. Hope it's fixed now.

gurustave commented on 2021-09-14 13:38 (UTC) (edited on 2021-09-14 13:38 (UTC) by gurustave)

@Icelk Thanks! That is indeed the hash I was getting. 255365c524d17aa71550b2c49d08590b17d8783612920c9cb28f4eafe0ef1930 VSCodium-linux-arm64-1.60.0.tar.gz

Icelk commented on 2021-09-14 04:55 (UTC)

@gurustave I will correct this one I come back home today. Thanks for the notice.

Does this hash work? 255365c524d17aa71550b2c49d08590b17d8783612920c9cb28f4eafe0ef1930 VSCodium-linux-arm64-1.60.0.tar.gz

gurustave commented on 2021-09-13 15:29 (UTC)

The Checksum for the aarch64/arm64 artifact appears to be incorrect. I downloaded the tar a four times between three computers, all had the same, different, checksum.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next › Last »