Package Details: nvidia-390xx-utils 390.157-16

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-390xx-utils.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: nvidia-390xx-utils
Description: NVIDIA drivers utilities
Upstream URL: https://www.nvidia.com/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: nvidia-390xx-libgl, nvidia-libgl, nvidia-utils
Provides: nvidia-390xx-libgl, nvidia-libgl, nvidia-utils, opengl-driver, vulkan-driver
Submitter: svenstaro
Maintainer: jonathon (vnctdj)
Last Packager: vnctdj
Votes: 61
Popularity: 1.06
First Submitted: 2020-03-11 17:29 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-05-10 22:07 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

Required by (319)

Sources (19)

Pinned Comments

vnctdj commented on 2025-01-24 07:37 (UTC)

Use this forum thread for discussion: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1946926

jonathon commented on 2022-05-26 09:46 (UTC)

Please don't flag this package out-of-date unless a new version has been released by NVIDIA.

jonathon commented on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) by jonathon)

The DKMS package guidelines are explicit that linux-headers should not be a dependency of any DKMS package.

As a concrete example of why including that as a hard dependency is a bad idea, what happens when linux is not an installed kernel?

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 31 Next › Last »

ventureo commented on 2025-05-20 16:32 (UTC)

I've made a patch for 6.15 kernel support, it would be nice if some will test it on real hardware.

https://github.com/CachyOS/CachyOS-PKGBUILDS/commit/7326b056e0cb3c218eba52ee281fdbc2d3dcd016

vnctdj commented on 2025-05-10 22:12 (UTC)

I've just added gcc-15.patch from bufferunderrun.

Thanks to all of you who took part in patch research and testing!

susanne commented on 2025-05-10 14:46 (UTC)

just to add one more confirmation: after adding gcc-15.patch the build works perfectly here, many thanks for your work! -s

canolucas commented on 2025-05-09 20:29 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-09 20:35 (UTC) by canolucas)

gcc-15.patch worked fine here as well. So, it seems we can add that patch to the package right ?

Considering:

* package is broken in its current state

* the patch is required for this package to be compatible with archlinux's current version of gcc

aldolat commented on 2025-05-09 17:10 (UTC)

I just used the patch gcc-15.patch of bufferunderrun here and upgrading to kernel 6.14.5-arch1-1 and gcc-15 was successful.

aruncveli commented on 2025-05-06 20:32 (UTC)

I could be missing something obvious,

Of course I'd forgotten to the patch entry to prepare(). Thanks @bufferunderrun.

And sorry to everyone else for the spam. Incredible work with the patches, investigations and brainstorming.

bufferunderrun commented on 2025-05-06 20:00 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-06 21:08 (UTC) by bufferunderrun)

I assume you added it with a relative path and it's not adding the patch. This should work:

patch -Np1 -i "${srcdir}/gcc-15.patch" -d "${srcdir}/${_pkg}"

No issues with linux 6.14.5

EDIT: I used makepkg -sifc

aruncveli commented on 2025-05-06 16:48 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-06 16:53 (UTC) by aruncveli)

I could be missing something obvious, since I normally use paru and haven't done this manually recently.

  1. Downloaded the content of gcc-15.patch from @bufferunderrun, with and without the addition from @drankinatty.

  2. Modified PKGBUILD

  3. updpkgsums

  4. makepkg -sic

pacman "succeeded", but dkms install --no-depmod nvidia/390.157 -k 6.14.4-arch1-2 exited 10. In the make.log, there were a lot of issues with conftest.sh. A snippet from ~600 lines is given below:

In file included from ././common/inc/conftest.h:5,
                 from ././common/inc/nv_stdarg.h:29,
                 from ././common/inc/os-interface.h:27,
                 from nvidia/nv-frontend.c:12:
././conftest/functions.h:15:2: error: #error kmem_cache_create() conftest failed!
   15 | #error kmem_cache_create() conftest failed!
      |  ^~~~~
././conftest/functions.h:16:2: error: #error on_each_cpu() conftest failed!
   16 | #error on_each_cpu() conftest failed!
      |  ^~~~~
././conftest/functions.h:17:2: error: #error smp_call_function() conftest failed!
   17 | #error smp_call_function() conftest failed!
      |  ^~~~~
././conftest/functions.h:22:2: error: #error acpi_walk_namespace() conftest failed!
   22 | #error acpi_walk_namespace() conftest failed!
      |  ^~~~~
././conftest/functions.h:24:2: error: #error dma_mapping_error() conftest failed!
   24 | #error dma_mapping_error() conftest failed!
      |  ^~~~~
././conftest/functions.h:71:2: error: #error wait_on_bit_lock() conftest failed!
   71 | #error wait_on_bit_lock() conftest failed!
      |  ^~~~~
././conftest/functions.h:76:2: error: #error radix_tree_replace_slot() conftest failed!
   76 | #error radix_tree_replace_slot() conftest failed!
      |  ^~~~~

Does anyone know what could be wrong?

drankinatty commented on 2025-05-06 08:02 (UTC)

I have put a write-up on The bbs.archlinux.org discussion page outlining where I think the 6.15 kernel problem will be. If you can take a look and add any thoughts you have on the differences with the 390 driver common/inc/nv-mm.h and how to backport the patch from the 470 driver to that file -- that is where I'm stuck.

bufferunderrun commented on 2025-05-05 14:06 (UTC)

I should add that kernel 6.15 will drop EXTRA_CFLAGS backward compatibility, so one would need to switch to ccflags-y when it's out. But judging from drankinatty's comments 6.15 will break quite a few other things, so people should prepare for a bumpy ride.

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 31 Next › Last »